Now it is getting interesting. As someone who grew up on Sesame Street, it was fascinating to understand how much effort was behind teachtaining (new word) me as a kid. Learning what is behind making a TV show, initiative, or marketing effort sticky caused me to look around and listen for attempts at stickiness. Was that message really intended for me? Was that lame jingle their attempt at sticking in my mind?
Recently I participated in a “treasure hunt” approach similar to the Columbia example in the book. This company through its email newsletter asked me to participate in an online game that asks you to fill your shopping cart with various natural brands that they are affiliated with. The intention is to get each of us to visit the various websites and begin to use these brands. There was a two-part incentive. If you visited all the sites, you got coupons to purchase these products, but that was the minor incentive. One lucky winner would get a $15,000 new kitchen. Since I have been consciously avoiding re-doing our kitchen (except for a fresh coat of paint), they got my attention. The game was fun and interesting enough to get me to do the work. As of today, I did not win, but I will keep you posted.
What recently demonstrated the stickiness factor for you? Was it an ad, a song, a company, or a person? Is all stickiness good? Sometimes I am amazed at the stickiness of certain pop songs with my kids. Can you think of an example where someone or something was attempting to be sticky for good or bad? In the over-crowded and potentially over-connected space of our lives, do you notice that these attempts are becoming more cutting edge or more over-the-top? Do these attempts move to you action, or are they just background noise? Look around for the next few days, and let all of us know what you observe.
Now that I think about watching Blue’s Clues with my kids, I realized how much I enjoyed that program as well, and its non-flashy journey based episodes. It was deliberately sticky, especially for parents who were growing tired with the lightning paced shows it was competing with. Or maybe I was just tired and needed a nap.
Gladwell describes how all people were not created equal when it comes to their influence on others. There are a “few” people with a “particular and rare set of social gifts” who are either Connectors, Mavens, or Salesmen.
Connectors know lots of people and create those small degrees of separation away from everyone (including Kevin Bacon). On page 39, he provides a list of names to help gauge your own level of Connector status. I was amazed at how much variation existed within the various groups where he gave this assessment. I am curious, what was your number? My number was 45. It did help that one of the names on the list was Weber.
I particularly liked how Connectors are described on page 51: “The point about Connectors is that by having a foot in so many different worlds, they have the effect of bringing them all together.” Poor William Dawes, it appears he was out ridden by a Connector.
Mavens are those that accumulate knowledge on things and readily share it with the rest of us. We trust their views on cars, appliances, schools, books, or even ice cream. “They aren’t passive collectors of information…once they figure out how to get that deal, they want to tell you about it too.” Page 62.
Salesmen, or those people who can persuade us and convince us are the last group. These are individuals that can change our minds, and sometimes even get us to buy things (even if it is just an idea). Gladwell describes communication with this groups as more of a dance. Think about your last interaction with an actual salesperson, what did you like or not like about that interaction?
Which are you? Connector? Maven? Salesmen? Who are the Connectors, Mavens, or Salesmen around you? Do these few influence you? If so, how? Let us know, and what you thought of this chapter, and remember to post on at least one other person’s post.
The Law of the Few: Well, there is nothing better when considering epidemic-like events than discussing the spread of STDs…but it does help make the case for how a few people can spread an idea or a product. The 80/20 rule seems to apply well especially as Gladwell describes the characteristics of the few as how much more “sociable they are, or how energetic or knowledgeable or influential among their peers.” (Page 21) Think about people in your circles whose influence seems to outweigh the average person, do you listen to them? Do they impact you? Are you that person?
Stickiness Factor: The ability for something to remain appears to be a key factor, essentially it has to “stick” with you in order to make the kind of impact Gladwell describes. “Stickiness means that a message makes an impact.” (Page 25) What was the last thing that “stuck” in your head? Was it a song, a commercial, a person, an event?
The Power of Context: Understanding the situation people find themselves in is the last rule and states “that human beings are a lot more sensitive to their environment than they may seem.” (Page 29) The “bystander problem” as described in this chapter was pretty alarming to me, and made me think about when I see an accident or lose power in the neighborhood. I mostly assume someone has already called 911 or the power company and I don’t pick up the phone. I do not always act because in context, there are so many people in the same situation, assumptions are easy to make. Does the environment impact you? How do you feel when you come home to a sink full of dishes, you witness an argument, or it rains on the day you planned that big outdoor event?
Gladwell is making the case, or perhaps building his case that these three rules need to be in place in order to pass the tipping point. Have just one of these, and it is not enough. You have two of them? Sorry, you still need another one. Can you think of an example of each rule in your own experience? If so, please share it with the group.
As a reminder, please read a chapter each week, post a thought about the reading, and comment on at least one other person’s post.
Malcolm Gladwell sets the stage for the Tipping Point by describing the rise in the sale of Hush Puppies, and the decline of New York City Crime. Both events didn’t gradually change over time, but something (almost like the spread of a virus) caused a shift that seems disproportional to the effort behind it.
Gladwell describes how radical this idea can be for some of us because “We are, as humans, heavily socialized to make a kind of rough approximation between cause and effect.” (The Tipping Point, Page 10) As I read this, I thought about how many times my mom and my grandmothers all had the same “we must all work really hard to make it” mantra. Clearly, they were socializing me around this principle.
All around us, we regularly witness and even use the term “viral” to describe ways to market, or the latest video that a friend passes to us online. Many companies, people, and ideas are trying to be that next overnight sensation by cracking some code, and getting past the tipping point.
Thanks for being part of this journey and I look forward to hearing from you.
Questions to Ponder
What was the last product, trend, or idea you witnessed that seemed to spread like wildfire? How did you either hear about it or participate in it?
Of the three characteristics Gladwell describes (contagiousness, little causes having big effects, and change happening not gradually but in one dramatic moment) which seems the most radical compared to how you usually think about events, changes or movements?
The votes are in and the winner is The Tipping Point, by Malcolm Gladwell. I have read his other books, use Outliers in a training session with leaders, and am excited to read this book together. This book club will get The Tipping Point off my nightstand and into our collective minds.
The book club will begin next Monday and I will post on a chapter a week. Counting the introduction, it will take us nine weeks to read together. Please find, borrow, buy, share, download, or check out a copy of the book to participate (there are still libraries out there). The goal is to have each of you reply to the weekly post and/or each other every week. If you have any questions please let me know.
Maybe together we will learn how our small actions will make a big difference.
We are in the home stretch. The idea is to have a virtual book club where we read a book together over the next few months. We have made a few book suggestions and your votes will determine which book we collectively read. The poll will be open until midnight tonight. If you haven’t voted, please do so.